By Alemayehu G. Mariam / June 1, 2011
Two historic events are unfolding before our eyes in Africa today. The new
president of Cote d’Ivoire, Alassane Ouattara, is asking the International
Criminal Court (ICC) to conduct an investigation into gross human rights
violations in his country. In a letter to ICC prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo,
Ouattara wrote: “It appears the Ivorian justice system, at the moment, is not
best placed to consider the most serious crimes committed over the recent
months, and that any attempts to bring to justice those who are most responsible
would risk running into all kinds of difficulties.” He emphatically urged the
prosecutor to bring the “people who bear the greatest responsibility for the
most serious crimes before the International Criminal Court.”
Hosni Mubarak, Egypt’s iron-fisted dictator for three decades, and his sons
are expected to stand trial in an Egyptian court for human rights violations.
The Egyptian Attorney General announced that Mubarak & Sons will face
charges of “intentional murder, attempted murder of demonstrators, abuse of
power to intentionally waste public funds and unlawfully profiting from public
funds for themselves and others.”
Bernard Munyagishari, one of the most notorious leaders of the genocidal
Rwandan Interahamwe, was apprehended last week (along with, in a separate
incident, Ratko Mladic, the Butcher of Srebrenica (Bosnia)) of the
Democratic Republic of Congo after nearly 16 years on the lam. According to a
2005 ICC indictment, Munyagishari “masterminded a virulent hate campaign against
the Tutsis” and trained and distributed weapons to Interahamwe groups to enable
them “more efficiently to attack and kill the Tutsis and Hutu opponents.”
Omar al-Bashir of the Sudan remains a fugitive from justice following his ICC
indictment for genocide and crimes against humanity. Bashir is accused of
“masterminding with absolute control” a criminal plan “to destroy in substantial
part the Fur, Masalit and Zaghawa ethnic groups” and causing the deaths of
35,000 people “outright” in the Darfur region since 2003.
A number of former Kenyan officials including the deputy prime minister and
two other ministers, the cabinet secretary, police chief and others stand
accused of murder, rape and persecution by the ICC. They are suspected of
orchestrating the post-election violence that resulted in the deaths of some
1,500 Kenyans and displacement of over 600,000.
There is no question that Moammar Gadhafi & Sons will soon be indicted by
the ICC for crimes against humanity and war crimes in connection with the
massive atrocities that are taking place in Libya today. In his ICC application
for an arrest warrant, Prosecutor Moreno-Ocampos argued: “The evidence shows
that Moammar Gadhafi personally ordered attacks on unarmed Libyan civilians. His
forces attacked Libyan civilians in their homes and in the public space, shot
demonstrators with live ammunition, used heavy weaponry against participants in
funeral processions and placed snipers to kill those leaving mosques after
prayers.”
The trial of the ruthless Liberian warlord Charles Taylor before the ICC on
charges of crimes against humanity and war crimes recently concluded in The
Hague after three and one-half years of litigation. A verdict is expected in the
foreseeable future.
Africa’s dictators who once sneered at the very notion of legal
accountability for their flagrant human rights abuses are now waking up at
night in cold sweat. They keep interrogating themselves in the middle of the
night: First it was Bashir. Now it is Mubarak. Next is Gadhafi and after him…
Ben Ali, Ali Saleh and then…?
Lady Justice “is like a train that is nearly always late”, but she has
finally arrived at her African destination with a scale in one hand and a sword
in the other, and without her blindfold to see the atrocities that continue to
be committed by Africa’s thugtators. A new dawn is rising over the
darkness of dictatorship that envelopes Africa.
The Beginning of Africa’s Second Independence?
For much of the six decades of independence, much of Africa has been under
the thumbs and boots of ruthless military and civilian thugs palming themselves
off as leaders while sucking the continent dry as their private estate. There
have been over 80
military coups in Africa and hundreds of attempted, plotted and alleged
coups. A 2002 African Union study estimated that corruption cost the continent
US$150 billion a year. Last week, a United Nations Development Program (UNDP) commissioned
report from Global Financial Integrity (GFI) on “illicit financial flows”
(money stolen by government officials and their cronies and stashed away in
foreign banks) from the Least Developed Countries (LDCs) revealed the theft of
US$ 8.4 billion from Ethiopia, the second
poorest country on the planet.
Could the election of Alassane Ouattara signal the beginning of Africa’s
second independence? Is there hope for the end of thugtatorship in
Africa and the beginning of a new era of democratic governance, openness and
political accountability?
Ouattara’s letter to Moreno-Ocampo is in itself an extraordinary act of
leadership, courage, audacity and supreme self-confidence. It is a monumental
event in Africa’s modern political history. No African leader has ever asked or
invited the ICC to investigate human rights abuses and prosecute the violators.
In fact, in August 2010, the African Union (AU) thumbed its nose at the ICC
stating: “The AU Member States shall not cooperate pursuant to the provisions of
Article 98 of the Rome Statute of the ICC relating to immunities, for the arrest
and surrender of President Omar El Bashir of the Sudan”. In other words,
Africa’s leaders will shelter the Butcher of Darfur from facing justice.
Against the backdrop of the AU denunciation, Ouattra’s invitation for an ICC
investigation is refreshing and reassuring. Manifestly, Ouattra is aware of the
fact that an ICC investigation is a double-edged sword that could cut him and
his supporters just as easily as Gbagbo and his crew. To be sure, there are
serious allegations of human rights abuses by Ouattara’s current prime minister,
Guillaume Soro. An ICC investigation could potentially implicate Ouattara
himself, possibly casting a long dark shadow over the remainder of his
presidency. Regardless, Ouattara says full speed ahead, damn the torpedoes. Let
the chips fall where they may!
Why is Ouattra doing this? Does he have something up his sleeve? I am still
reeling from the fact that an African leader is actually upholding human rights
instead of trashing them, calling for an independent investigation instead of
putting out a whitewash. Could it be that Ouattara is a truly new breed of
African leader? Is it possible that he genuinely believes in the rule of
law, human rights and full legal accountability? Maybe he wants to end the
culture of impunity in his country and set a shining example of a new culture of
respect for human rights for the continent. Just maybe Ouattra’s leadership role
model is Nelson Mandela.
On May 21, the day of Ouattara’s formal inauguration, the ICC Prosecutor
lodged an application with the ICC to investigate “crimes within the
jurisdiction of the Court that have been committed in the Ivory Coast since 28
November 2010.”
Nature of Human Rights Violations in the Cote d’Ivoire
The human rights violations alleged in Cote d’Ivoire are of the most
egregious types. According to a January
2011 Human Rights Watch Report, security forces and militia under the
control of Laurent Gbagbo have allegedly committed extrajudicial killings,
forced disappearances, torture, and rape. Gbagbo’s supporters are accused
of undertaking an “organized campaign of violence targeting members of
opposition political parties, ethnic groups from northern Côte d’Ivoire,
Muslims, and immigrants from neighboring West African countries.” Seven women
supporters of Ouattara engaged in peaceful demonstration were gunned
down before the cameras by Gbagbo’s forces in February 2011.
According to an April
2011 Human Rights Watch Report, “forces loyal to President-elect Alassane
Ouattara killed hundreds of civilians, raped more than 20 alleged supporters of
his rival, Laurent Gbagbo, and burned at least 10 villages in Côte d’Ivoire’s
far western region.” The report alleged “in one particularly horrific incident,
hundreds of ethnic Guéré civilians perceived as supporting Gbagbo were massacred
in the western town of Duékoué by a mixture of pro-Ouattara groups.” Credible
reports by charity groups who visited the location put the number at over one
thousand.
The Ivorian human rights violators will likely face war crimes and crimes
against humanity charges similar to those lodged against the former
Liberian warlord Charles Taylor. For purposes of war crimes
(Convention III, Article 3 Geneva Convention (1949) and of Additional Protocol
II), charges will likely include unlawful killings, terrorizing the civilian
population, physical violence, sexual violence, abductions and pillage, among
others. Other particularized charges may include ill-treatment or deportation of
civilian residents, the killing of prisoners and wanton destruction of
cities, towns and villages. Charges of crimes against humanity (Article 7, Rome
Statute of the International Criminal Court) will likely include murder, rape,
abductions, political or religious persecution and other inhumane acts and
practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto
authority. There is substantial evidence to show the occurrence of widespread
and systematic practices of atrocity by both sides of the Ivorian conflict in
the post-election period to justify vigorous prosecutions.
No Truth, No Reconciliation. No Justice, No Peace.
What Ouattra has done in Cote d’Ivoire could be the most significant act in
the cause of the freedom, democracy and human rights in Africa’s modern history.
By the stroke of his pen, Ouattra has the raised the bar for legal
accountability and may have begun a new era and tradition of the rule of law in
the continent. By letting justice take its course, Ouattara has taken the first
decisive step to heal the wounds and divisions of Ivorian society.
There are many lessons to be learned from Ouattara’s heroic act. First,
without revealing the truth about human rights abuses, there can be no
reconciliation in Cote d’Ivoire or any other society victimized by massive human
rights violations. The South Africans managed to make an effective transition to
democracy and heal a society torn apart by the vile and inhuman ideology of
apartheid in their Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC).
Second, if Africa’s dictators believe they will face justice for their
criminal actions regardless of how long it takes, they will think a hundred
times before ordering massacres of peaceful unarmed demonstrators in the
streets, jailing of thousands of innocent people and indiscriminate
bombing of civilians. Third, legal accountability under international
human rights standards means Africa’s dictators will have no place to run to or
hide and enjoy their billions in stolen loot. The world will be their
prison.
When the rule of law is deep-rooted in Africa, the tables will finally turn.
The people will no longer fear their leaders and governments. Rather, the
leaders and government institutions will fear the people. That will mark
Africa’s long overdue transition from thugtatorship (“the highest stage of
African dictatorship”) to democracy.
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. said: “We shall overcome because the arc of the
moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice.” Justice has yet to arrive
for 193 unarmed Ethiopian protesters massacred in the streets in 2005 and 763
shot and wounded. These victims are not some nameless individuals buried in
shallow graves. Their identities are well known to all and
shall never be forgotten. The identities
of the 237 policemen who committed the massacre are also well known.
There is overwhelming evidence of gross human rights abuses in Gambella in
western Ethiopia and in the Ogaden
region in the east as well as many other parts of the country. There
are thousands of
political prisoners languishing in secret prisons in Ethiopia today.
The monstrous crimes committed against these victims will not remain forever
shrouded in the fog of history because the arc of the moral universe is long and
it bends towards justice. That is why I believe justice delayed in Ethiopia is
NOT justice denied. Paraphrasing the great African American poet Langston
Hughes, justice delayed in Ethiopia is a “sore that festers and runs, and sags”
like a heavy load ready to explode.
Keep Hope Alive in Ethiopia!
Previous commentaries by the author are available at: www.huffingtonpost.com/alemayehu-g-mariam/
Home